Whatâs
Wrong Today:
In January
2012, the Wrongologist wrote about MERS:
household name, but it should be. MERS is the Mortgage Electronic
Registration System. It was created in 1995 as a privately held venture of the
mortgage banking industry. If you’ve bought a house or refinanced in the last
decade, there’s a good chance you signed a document at closing that designates MERS as your new
lender. Its founders and Board of Directors include executives from
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America and Citibank.
Instead of
individual banks or lenders registering with counties each time a loan was sold
or re-sold, MERS handled the initial registration and then became the
“nominal” note-holder. Then, each time the note was passed on, MERS
would record the transaction in its computers — but no matter who the actual owner of the note
was, MERS remained the legally registered assignee of the note with the county.
Without MERS, the mortgage bubble
would not have been physically possible. By using MERS,
lenders/buyers of mortgages no longer had to document their transactions with
county clerks, or pay the courthouse registration and processing fees. And MERS
holds the liens on behalf of all the players in the game.
The Wrongologist
concluded:
paradise: If MERS is the law for
mortgages, then what about other State laws? If the law of the
land is what the banks have written in software and is no longer controlled by
the State â and itâs not, because of MERS â then which State laws are next?
Well, hereâs
whatâs next. Dave Dayden reports:
Services Committee has tucked a provision into a mortgage finance reform bill that
would create a privately held âNational Mortgage Data Repository.â The
repository would basically look like MERS, the bank-owned electronic database
tracking mortgage transfers. The difference is that the National Mortgage Data
Repository would have the force of statute to carry out the exact same
behavior.
Although
the MERS system has been subject to many lawsuits throughout the country, initially
for the âRobo-signingâ mess, according to this billâs text, any document
arising from this repository would be legal on its face, pre-empting state and federal laws on foreclosure.
Rep. Jeb
Hensarling (R-TX), chair of the House Financial Services Committee, introduced
the bill, called the âProtecting American Taxpayers and Homeowners (PATH)
Actâ on July 11th. Itâs the House Republican response to a series of
bills and initiatives to deal with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and set a course
for the future of mortgage finance. Most of the bill deals with that: in Hensarlingâs
vision, Fannie and Freddie should be dismantled within five years, and
private financial services firms take up the slack with virtually no government
guarantee.
But Title III
of the proposed PATH Act directs the Federal Housing Finance Agency to provide
a charter for the National Mortgage Market Utility (NMMU). The utility would
create standard practices for origination, servicing, pooling and
securitization of mortgages, and operate a platform for holding and bundling
mortgages just like MERS.
But, the
bill also allows the big banks to wrap up the documentation failures of the
bubble years under the cover of a new federal regulation. That should sound a
few alarms throughout America.
The bill
proposes that the National Mortgage Market Utility would exempt mortgage backed
securities from SEC oversight under the Securities Act of 1933. This would
allow the mortgage and derivatives bubble of 2007-2008 to come back with a vengeance.
From the proposed bill, the repositoryâs defined purpose is to: (emphasis by
the Wrongologist)
that can arise when paper notes cannot be produced, due to loss or destruction
as a result of natural disaster or other causes; and to provide a uniform
procedure for demonstrating the right to act with regard to such notes or other
registered data for
all actions in any State or Federal proceeding, judicial or nonjudicial,
involving such notes or other data.
This is an
elegant solution for the Banks. It takes all the questions arising from whether
MERS has the legal right to foreclose, all the myriad problems with mortgage
documentation, and buries them with a brand-new private database that pre-empts
all those questions and concerns. All the losses
MERS has suffered in state courts? Gone. All those problems servicers are
having foreclosing in states like Nevada
and California
and elsewhere? Also gone.
States
have always controlled property law, but this Republican bill would remove state
control, putting it not in the hands of the federal government, but in a private entity. The banks would be able to
foreclose because a repository, in all likelihood owned by the banks, said they
had that legal right.
The PATH Act is unlikely to become law. But, it represents the
opening negotiating position of the banks regarding how they want to insulate
themselves from foreclosure fraud in the future: Just make it impossible to
challenge fraudulent documents by using oneâs personal private property and due
process rights.
âProtecting
American Taxpayers and Homeowners (PATH) Act.â How Orwellian: No consumer will
be protected, this bill only protects the banks.
Why are
Republicans, who are so devoted to rugged individualism, states rights, the 10th
Amendment, and smaller government, so comfortable with grabbing this power from
individuals and the states?
You can bet that when a bill is named, that the purpose is other. Not always, but think of the Patriot Act – an executive power grabs that subjects all Americans to surveillance at least in some manner. And this bill clearly does not protect homeowners or taxpayers.
Very interesting take on MERS, being in the mortgage industry for 20 years, I was around when it started. It certainly makes the process more efficient, with regard to recording mortgages, but loans can/do fund without the mortgage being recorded, so I am not sure it would have has much of an effect not the mortgage meltdown of 2008. Loans would have funded anyway. MERS’s benefit is post funding
@ Tim: Appreciate your insight. The issue regarding MERS and the meltdown has more to do with MERS enabling simpler securitization and the explosion in the sale of mortgage derivatives in 2007-2008.