Gallup has an informative chart about the declining percentage of uninsured in the US:
The percentage of uninsured Americans climbed from the mid-14% range in early 2008 and peaked at 18.0% in the third quarter of 2013. The uninsured rate has dropped sharply since Obamacare (the Affordable Care Act) took effect at the beginning of 2014.
It is possible to argue that an improving economy and a falling unemployment rate may have accelerated the steep drop in the percentage of uninsured over the past year. However, the uninsured rate is significantly lower than it was in early 2008, before the Great Recession, suggesting that the recent decline is due more to Obamacare than to just an improving economy.
From NY Magazine on this trend:
It is starting to look possible that this trend is not some random fluke that has happened six straight quarters but is somehow related to the enactment of Obamacare. So any day now, we can expect conservative politicians and intellectuals to begin publicly rethinking their analysis of this law.
They were correct. Here is the 2010-2014 short version of the Republican viewpoint on the ACA:
The ACA will not reduce the number of people without health insurance. Indeed, it might make this problem we donât consider a problem, even worse.
Now that the ACA looks to be doing the job, the 2015 short version of the Republican viewpoint is:
Everyone knew that the ACA would result in a huge drop in the number of people without health insurance â what does that prove? Besides, how can we really know that it all isnât a big coincidence?
This is called âMoving the Goal Postsâ. Wikipedia says it means
To change the criterion (goal) of a process or competition while still in progress, in such a way that the new goal offers one side an intentional advantage or disadvantage.
Here is an example of moving the goal posts. From Cliff Asness: (emphasis by the Wrongologist)
In contrast, the rise in coverage is heralded by a myriad of Obamacare supporters as one of two major pieces of proof the law is working. But, how can something we knew before the fact be proof of anything?
Shorter: If we predict that something good will happen as a result of a new law, and that good thing happens, it doesn’t count as proof that the law served its purpose or was any good at all, unless Republicans say so.
The goal post movers also said Obamacare was a job killer. House Speaker John Boehner announced on March 17, 2010, five days before President Obama signed the ACA into law:
The President ⌠continues to push his job-killing government takeover of health care that will hurt small businesses at a time when they need certainty, not more Washington tax hikes and mandates.
In 2011, House Republicans even passed the âRepealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Actâ â the first time that any piece of congressional legislation ever had âjob-killingâ in its title. Sadly for both Mr. Boehner and the House Republicans, we have added 12 million new private sector jobs since the bill was passed.
There is a new J.D. Power survey which looks at enrollee satisfaction with the ACA. It finds that people who signed up for insurance on the exchanges were slightly more satisfied (69.6%) than people with non-exchange plans, usually through employers (67.9%). People re-enrolling on the exchanges were 74.4% satisfied. New enrollees for 2015 were 5.5% more satisfied than 2014 enrollees, who endured the disastrous roll-out of healthcare.gov. So people like the subsidies and they like their actual insurance policies.
Think about it: ACA forecasted costs have been consistently revised downwards. The number of uninsured are dramatically lower. Satisfaction with Obamacare is higher, and it didnât kill jobs.
It’s utter Tyranny.
Maybe that’s why the Senate’s top five Republican leaders have cosponsored legislation to extend Obamacare insurance subsidies until 2017. The extension will give Republicans more time to again move the goal posts.
They should try this one: Now that Republicans control Congress and most state governments, we have way fewer uninsured.
Conservative policies work!
As a registered Republican, I swear that there was a time when Republicans supported cautious tax increases (as did Tom Cahill in NJ) and uttered true statements about policies. But that time ended with Reagan – though those in office when he was elected still lived in the real world. Most of those still around have flipped and all recent Republicans come from an alternate universe. So what Republicans say has not relation to our world, but rather to another universe (see string theory) where pro-growth tax cuts work just fine, and where the EPA is no more, and we have lots of good jobs and clean rivers.