âEmpires are lost when inadequate men become leaders and wage war for base reasons or no reason at all.â – Sun Tzu
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) Cotton accused President Obama of a “false choice” between his framework deal on Iran’s nuclear program and war. He then downplayed what would happen if we just bombed Iran: (emphasis by the Wrongologist)
It would be something more along the lines of what President Clinton did in December 1998 during Operation Desert Fox. Several days of air and naval bombing against Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction facilities for exactly the same kind of behavior. For interfering with weapons inspectors and for disobeying Security Council resolutions. All we’re asking is that the president simply be as tough in the protection of America’s national security interest as Bill Clinton was.
Who cares what the generals, intelligence analysts and foreign policy experts think after war gaming various scenarios for a war with Iran? Hint: itâs not a pretty outcome.
But, for Sen. Cotton, the only opinion that really matters is Sen. Cottonâs, Americaâs new military strategist. Sen. Cotton was elected in part because of his prior military service, having served in Iraq and Afghanistan. He left the military in 2013. Sadly, not everyone who was in combat while serving is a strategic thinker. Given his military experience, he should know that geopolitics is not a Hollywood movie.
This guy has a romantic vision of how a âquick warâ would proceed. He says it would be a few days of air and naval bombing against Iranâs nuclear facilities. He apparently thinks that Iran would not move against American shipping in the Gulf, against Israel, or even attempt to take out our military in the ME. And our allies? Who would support us, except Israel and Saudi Arabia? And once the party is over, and Iran dusts off and picks up the pieces, they would surely build nuclear weapons. Wouldnât we then have to bomb them again?
Wouldnât that make the US a pariah state?
This reminds us that Republicans, in their eagerness for war, often diminish the costs to America of pursuing the military option. Yep, only a four day war, and then we declare victory! Or, longer, and messier, and then what? Consider this:
⢠“We will be greeted as liberators”
⢠“Oil revenues will pay for it”
⢠“There is no insurgency”
⢠“The insurgency is in its last throes”
It was 12 years ago that pundits and politicians were touting how fast and cheaply we could turn Iraq into a model democracy. Well, the results are in, but they apparently havenât registered for Sen. Cotton, who needs to come up with some new and better neo-con talking points.
The neo-cons, the hawks and their spokespersons, Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, have rarely met an international issue that doesnât require more American military muscle, and this includes Iran. Perhaps Sen. Cotton is auditioning to replace the decaying Sen. McCain or Sen. Graham in the permanent warmongering Senator chair on the Sunday talkies? He is much younger (38) and could conceivably remain on the national political stage for the next 40 years. Would Sunday Show status give him the credibility to run for POTUS like McCain did, and Graham is attempting to do now?
A strategy tip for Sen. Cotton: âNegotiating from a position of strengthâ doesnât mean, âWe should negotiate only after we have our boots on their necksâ, so if they refuse to accept our terms, we crush them, claiming that they wouldnât negotiate. He thinks that anything that prevents us from exercising the âboot on the neckâ option means weâre in a position of weakness. Thatâs awful on a lot of levels.
How can a smart guy, a Harvard grad, a lawyer, someone with significant military service, get it so wrong when it comes to geopolitics and military strategy? He should know the difference between Iraq and Iran. In Iraq, we had already decimated their military, destroyed their air defense system and made their airspace into a no-fly zone before our 2003 attack. Iran, which despite crippling economic sanctions, still has its air defense systems, its anti-ship missiles, (which, some war games showed can cripple our fleet in the Persian Gulf) and its military is intact.
Iraq was fractured by sectarian division. It has about 31 million people and is 60% the size of Texas.
Iran is not Arab, it is Muslim, and unified. It has 80 million people and is twice the size of Texas.
Sen. Cotton needs to bone up on military strategy and the Middle East.
If we look at air campaigns from WW2 to Vietnam, they have all failed, unless we consider success as what we achieve when almost nothing is left standing – as was the case in Germany and Japan near the end. The bombing unites a nation, and in the case of Germany, production went up for most of the period. Japan was a trickier case because our submarines destroyed most access to raw materials (so it was not the bombing).
And we do not intent to lay waste to Iran – so we will get the worst of both worlds. little destruction and we will have unified the people. Not a good idea.