The Daily Escape:
 Camden, ME – November 2023 photo by Daniel F. Dishner. Note the star: It’s on top of nearby Mt.Battie.
Kissinger may have changed the world, but that isnât always a good thing. The media are calling his legacy âcomplicatedâ. For Wrongo, it isnât complicated. He may have gotten Nixon to China and negotiated (?) the end of the war in Vietnam, but his time on our foreign policy stage is strewn with death and destruction. Think about the carpet bombing of Cambodia that led to the demonstrations against the war in May 1970 and to the murders at Kent State and Jackson State University. Think about the coup in Chile that overthrew Salvador Allende.
Now, Nixonâs entire Cabinet is dead.
Kissingerâs philosophy was to look at âthe big pictureâ. He was gladdened by how his China diplomacy rattled the Soviets. Most of Wrongoâs current thinking about Kissinger comes from reading Christopher Hitchensâ 2001 book, âThe Trial of Henry Kissingerâ. Hitchens talks about Kissinger’s role in the destruction of Chilean democracy in favor of the Pinochet dictatorship. And when Pinochet ordered the assassination of dissenter and former U.S. ambassador Orlando Letelier on US soil by blowing up his car in Washington, Kissinger was fine with that.
He was responsible for the prolongation of the Vietnam War through the sabotage of Lyndon Johnson’s 1968 Vietnam peace talks along with the civilian deaths from the US’ bombing in Laos and Cambodia, helping to usher in the Khmer Rouge, while also not doing anything positive to win the Vietnam war. Kissinger then became supportive of the Khmer Rouge. He saw its leader, Pol Pot as a counterweight against North Vietnam. He asked Thailandâs foreign minister to tell the Khmer Rouge: âWe will be friends with them. They are murderous thugs, but we wonât let that stand in our way. We are prepared to improve relations with them.â
That was Kissingerâs moral philosophy.
Kissinger was behind the Greek military junta’s invasion of Cyprus in 1974, and the Pakistani army’s crimes against humanity in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh). And we shouldnât forget the Indonesian invasion and subsequent destruction of East Timor.
Quite the record for a Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.
Late in life. Kissinger continued supporting authoritarians including Putin. Kissinger intervened in Putinâs imperialist war in Ukraine in 2022 to support the idea that the West should bully Zelensky into giving up territory to the Russians. He was also on the board of Theranos helping to facilitate the fraud while lining his pockets.
Wrongo wrote earlier this year about how he started out as a Kissinger fanboy, having read his 1957 book âNuclear Weapons and Foreign Policyâ while in high school. It criticized the Eisenhower Administrationâs âmassive retaliationâ nuclear doctrine. It proposed the use of tactical nuclear weapons on a regular basis to help win wars. By the time that Wrongo was running a tactical nuclear missile base in the mid-1960s, he was no longer a fan. From Wrongo:
âWrongo met Kissinger in the mid-1980s at an event hosted by David Rockefeller at his Pocantico Hills estate. HK was walking his dog, a particularly obstreperous Golden Retriever. Wrongo asked âWhatâs the dogâs name?â Kissinger replied: âMadmanâ. Could there be a more perfect name for a Kissinger family pet?â
Here are a few headlines announcing Kissingerâs death:
Youâve gotta love the Rolling Stone headline.
Kissingerâs legacy is defined by his role in the USâs resumption of ties with China. He did the groundwork for Nixonâs 1972 visit to China and made more than 100 trips to the country over the years. The WaPo noted that the China state broadcaster labeled Kissinger an âold friend of the Chinese people.â
Letâs close with another possibly apocryphal story about Kissinger by Corey Robin:
Letâs hope that Henry the K is having a really hot time in his new condo.
It was clear at the time (so early 1970s) that US actions in both Cambodia and Chile were morally wrong and with Cambodia the bombing led to Pol Pot and more ruin. Kissinger basked in the glow of being treated as a sage and great man, but I think this time, the glow has disappeared. History will see him (I believe) as similarly as malign an influencer as Dick Cheney.
Must agree with you and Mr. McKenna…a self- serving man who started out so positively, then became a manipulator with less than ideal actions. Only long-term historians will be able to tell.
Wrongo, I believe you have gotten this righto!
I’ve been fascinated by this man for most of my adult life. Like you, I believed early on that he was exceptionally talented but morally challenged. I believe that history will judge him harshly for his dealings with outright evil, something that a country like ours – with all of its inherent challenges – cannot allow or excuse!