The Daily Escape:
Aiguille du Midi – 2019 photo by Berenicids. The Aiguille du Midi (12,605Â ft.) is part of the Mont Blanc massif in the French Alps. It can be directly accessed by cable car from Chamonix. If you enlarge the picture, the cable car building is visible at the very top of the mountain.
The end of Wrongoâs favorite sport, the college basketball season, happens on Monday. Tonight is the Final Four, the Wrong familyâs equivalent of the Super Bowl, with family gathering for food and drink around the TV.
But, that doesnât start until the early evening, so weâve got time to talk about another scary piece of news this week: There will be severe human impacts caused by the next wave of automation. The bottom line is that plenty of jobs will be lost and we’ll see societal disruption as machines and robots take over American jobs. Axios takes it from there:
âIn a new report, the Aspen Institute nudges policymakers away from any notion that the American economy will naturally adjust as robots are introduced at an accelerated pace over the coming two and three decades.â
Axios goes on to quote Aspenâs Alistair Fitzpayne who says that, workers displaced in prior technological cycles “have experienced profound downward mobility” in new jobs at much lower pay and benefits.
The report’s executive summary warns, “Artificial intelligence and other new technologies may lead to deeper, faster, broader, and more disruptive automation”, and retraining programs may be unable to mitigate the downward trend in earnings and social status. Aspen warns that fewer jobs may be created than are destroyed:
- No one knows how many new jobs will be produced, where they will be created, or how much they will pay.
- Most studies play down the real possibility that the automation age could go very wrong, for an extended period, for large swaths of workers and their communities.
- Workers who lost their jobs in the wave of manufacturing layoffs in the early 1980s, for instance, were still earning 15%-20% less in their new work 20 years later, according to the Aspen report.
Axios reports that Aspen tries to pull the punch, saying that with the right policy choices, we can choose to create an economy that works for everybody. That we can encourage employers to adopt a more “human-centric approach” to delivering the bottom line. That we can support displaced workers through retraining, reemployment services, and unemployment insurance to help them transition to new jobs and careers.
Maybe, but it seems questionable that those things will spontaneously happen. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) suggests all this new technology might be liberating, but she has reservations:
âThe reason weâre not excited by it is because we live in a society where if you donât have a job, you are left to die. And that is, at its core, our problem.â
The cultural stigma attached to job loss is profound, and that is unlikely to change by adding more retraining programs. Conservatives are not about to celebrate jobless people having more time to learn, to create art, or enjoy the world they live in, as long as they are unemployed.
The merciless mantra of shareholder value above all, and our corporate mastersâ acceptance of the inevitability of technological change means that low and moderate-skill workers are expendable. Efficiency for more bottom line is more important than the lives of human workers.
This coming automation disruption is hard to see now. But estimates are that it will impact as many as 40% of American workers.
The 21st Century American corporation isnât our friend, as currently constituted and rewarded. It is the enemy of our society, because they are quietly working to eliminate our jobs. We constantly reduce their taxes, vainly hoping for them to create more jobs. We look the other way when they pollute our environment. We allow them to disproportionately finance our elections.
Itâs time for a new Capitalism.
But youâve had enough for this week, so on to the Saturday Soother. Start slowly, particularly if you plan to stay up until the last Final Four game ends at around midnight. Letâs brew up a cup of New Hampshireâs Flight Coffeeâs single origin Tanzania Tarime AB, ($17/12oz.), with its floral fragrance and intensely sweet flavor. Now settle into your favorite chair and listen to âSpring Morningâ by Frederick Delius, played by the Royal Scottish National Orchestra and conducted by David Lloyd Jones. âSpring Morningâ is the third of ‘Three Small Tone Poems’ by Delius:
Those who read the Wrongologist in email can view the video here.
I see automation in our work site. Insurance claims and underwriting were (and still are) the province of literate folks who learn by reading files and over time they begin to be able to tell what stands out as different and worrisome. For example, which makes sense and which does not? A 23 year old with an Ohio driverâs license, working in LA for a media company making 80k, or a 31 year old (working under a visa) whose ID is from NY but is working in a Chinese restaurant in West Virginia. To an experienced underwriter, we ignore the address discrepancy (address vs ID) because this is a typical post college career start. The second is a poor immigrant being exploited.
We are relying more on data and alerts to screen applications for more review but the customer is always a step ahead.
Over time, we will have far fewer underwriters or senior claims examiners and so jobs that pay 70-80k in the 5th year will pay 60k in the 15th year.
I am glad I am 67+ and so will not have to eke out a career over 20 years.
Oh, and the data scientists we hire are largely second generation immigrants, bright but they have only a limited cultural context from which to develop alerts.