Thoughts on Alito’s Draft Opinion

Daily Escape:

Chama River, near Abiquiu, NM – 2022 photo by James C. Wilson

Wrongo’s last column spoke about how the Republican Party had become the Party of White Christian Nationalists. And that was before the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade was leaked to the world. It seems that this likely decision is a key example of how radical Christians are assuming a political role in America that isn’t dissimilar to the Taliban’s in Afghanistan.

Justice Alito’s draft opinion reinforces the view that there’s a very dangerous Christian movement afoot in our nation. It’s not enough for them to live in a country where they are completely free to practice their own religious beliefs. They require the rest of us to live by their religious code, too.

Two thoughts: First about the Court’s legitimacy in the eyes of the public when they overturn a 50-year-old precedent. The Editorial Board of the WaPo summarized the damage to the legitimacy of the Court that Justice Alito is likely to inflict:

“The Court’s legitimacy rests on the notion that it follows the law, not the personal or ideological preferences of the justices who happen to serve on it at any given time….What brought the Court to its current precipice was not a fundamental shift in American values regarding abortion. It was the [result of] shameless legislative maneuvering of Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell, who jammed two Trump-nominated justices onto the Court.”

For some time, you’ve been able to predict the votes of Supreme Court Justices by knowing the Party of the president that appointed them. That is particularly true if the issue is either overtly political or a Culture War proxy for Republican Party doctrine.

The American people want to believe the law is fair and impartial, because everyone wants to live in a just and predictable society. But this isn’t what Conservatives want. Their so-called love of religion and love of authority move them to reduce or eliminate voting rights, and now, to eliminate women’s rights.

Second, Wrongo thinks that the Conservative Court has gone a political bridge too far. Most polls show that the rights granted in the Roe v. Wade decision are broadly popular, even among Republicans. And Americans have lived with those rights for almost 50 years, assuming it was an inviolable Constitutional right, you know, like owning a gun.

Heather Cox Richardson says that the Supreme Court has never before taken away a Constitutional right. That means there will certainly be a political backlash against those who have supported this attack against women specifically, and against privacy rights in general.

Pew reports that women are more likely than men to express support for legal abortion (62% vs. 56%). And among adults under age 30, 67% say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, as do 61% of adults in their 30s and 40s.

This describes the foundation of a political movement: Young women as the vanguard of an anti-Republican crusade (pardon the Christian pun). We also know that young people historically have had the lowest voter turnout, dating back to the 1960s. Here’s a graph showing what percentage of women have voted by age group:

Source: Stastia

It was only in 2020 that very young women reached the 50% turnout level for the first time in 50 years. They still lag all other age groups in voting. This means that a wealth of untapped political power lies waiting to be flexed this fall, and overturning Roe is the spark that can light the fire.

Add to that Black and Hispanic women who according to a Guttmacher Institute report are, respectively, three and two times more likely to have an unintended pregnancy than white women. Nationally, Black women had 37% of abortions, white women had 34%, and Hispanic women had 22%. Black women are also more than three times more likely to suffer a pregnancy-related death compared to white women.

Pew also reported that two-thirds of Asian (68%), and Black adults (67%) say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, as do 58% of Hispanic adults.

All of this creates the basis for a national political movement to defeat anti-abortion candidates at local, state, and national levels. Think about how a young woman like Mallory McMorrow who spoke so effectively against the Republican Culture War, could be a leader in the fight.

Larry Sabato’s Crystal Ball lists seven states that offer the biggest potential for a Democratic backlash driven by abortion rights: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Each of these states has a highly competitive gubernatorial or Senate race on tap for this fall, and several of them have two.

Before you say it’s impossible, remember that in Ireland in 2012, the death of a young woman who had been denied a medically necessary abortion became a rallying cry for the abortion rights movement. In 2018, this Catholic country held a referendum to change their Constitution to legalize abortion, which passed with over 66% support.

The non-Christian-radical path forward is via the ballot box, where women should be poised to lead us to a rebuilt society. Even as the Roberts Court and Republicans turn their backs on the Constitution, we must still embrace it.

The Roberts Court’s radical Christian majority is, intentionally or not, administering a fatal blow to the Court’s legitimacy.

Facebooklinkedinrss
terence e mckenna

The conservative movement against the courts began with their opposition to the Supreme Court’s upholding of the rights of African American – rights grants by the 13th to 15th amendments.

Billboards in the South would blast “Impeach Earl Warren.” Bill Buckley said much the same by the way.

Much of the court’s work was founded on a notion that the constitution was a living document and would evolve with the nation. Hamilton thought as much by the way. And the 9th amendment specifically stated that enumerating some rights did not diminish other that the people possessed.

Nonetheless, the conservative movement has promulgated the notion that enumerated rights are superior and they built a network of zealots (the Federalist Society to enforce this).

The right to abortion as announced in Roe v Wade was based on a notion of a personal right to control ones body that was never enumerated but was clearly at the heart of notions like “dont’ tread on me” as well as the protections against certain searches and seizures. Though Alito pretends that abortion is not part of America’s traditions. But if you study the history of women and pregnancy, abortion – especially medical abortion – was commonplace in America and was practice by midwives. Potions made from plants like Penny Royal and such were used to induce an abortion. The control of abortion came later – after the Civil War, when both poisons began to be controlled and doctors began to take control of pregnancy.

The ultimate meaning of the courts apparent assault on modern America will be the retraction of gay rights, the resumption of state attacks on contraception and possibly a return to laws against marrying outside of ones race (this may be harder to do, but they would clearly support it.

The next 2 years could be terrible for the people. Glad I am over 70.

terence e mckenna

One more point, as a cradle catholic who still sings in a church choir, it should be frightening to Americans that the only suitable candidates for the Supreme Court for the GOP are the products of Catholic prep-schools. So entitled kids who come from a mono-culture.

Ottho Heldring

The holier-than-thou American Taliban, headed by Donald J. Trump, now has the Supreme Court in its pocket.

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.