Welcome to a week that included TikTok, March Madness and St. Patrickâs Day!
The House overwhelmingly passed legislation to ban TikTok:
But will it ever become law?
Trump said the quiet part out loud:
Insulin remains under threat:
Yes, Big pharma is suing the Biden administration for making insulin affordable. They say his actions are âunconstitutionalâ. Itâs important to remember that they didnât invent insulin and it is cheap to make.
The GOPâs double standard on documents:
The mystery surrounding Princess Kate isnât going away:
Boeing is so badly broken itâs hard to see how it recovers:
(This is most likely the only column this week, as Wrongo is working on an outside project.)
Today letâs cover a few disparate topics that are about clean-up from the Biden State of the Union address. The Hollywood Reporterreports on Bidenâs viewership ratings with this headline:
âThe 2024 State of the Union address drew a larger TV audience than the 2023 address.â
Bidenâs speech averaged 32.23 million viewers across 14 broadcast and cable outlets, almost 5 million more viewers than the 2023 State of the Union. Viewership rose on all of the largest outlets by about 18%. Â More:
âThe vast majority of viewers â 28.47 million â watched the State of the Union on the big four broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC) and the three largest cable news outlets (CNN, Fox News and MSNBC). All seven outlets drew a bigger audience than they did for last yearâs address.â
So much for viewer apathy. One big surprise to Wrongo is that Fox News led with 5.84 million viewers, beating out the 5.24 million for ABC, which had the largest viewership among the broadcast networks. NBCâs 4.47 million viewers finished third, followed by MSNBC at 4.43 million, (its largest audience ever for a State of the Union).
Why would Fox have more viewers when their network demographics skew far more to the Right than the others? Did they tune in hoping to see a Biden senior moment?
Second, Sen. Katie Britt (R-Jesus) lied in her rebuttal for the GOP.
Third, Umir Haqueâs newsletter, the issue has some good insights that Wrongo hasnât seen elsewhere. About leadership: (emphasis, parenthesis and brackets by Wrongo)
âWe recently discussed the difference between occupying a leadership positionâand being accepted as a leader. This Bidenâs been hid[den] away by the Democratic machine….Those roaring, electrified [people attending the speech)? Those surging positivity ratings? Thatâs…going from merely occupying the position, to being accepted as a leader.â
More:
âBiden quietly proposed something very much like a new America. A new American social contract. The ideas came so fast and furious that they were almost easy to miss, sandwiched between philosophy and persuasion.â
More:
â…most State of the Unions arenât like that. Theyâre pretty boring because Presidents tout their accomplishments. Theyâre backwards looking…sort of performance reviews….This one really was…profoundly different.â
Haque who lives in the UK, says that the ideas Biden put forth, are very popular in Europe:
Taxing billionaires, which is part of a new movement, arising mostly in Europe, to reduce inequality, by having a global tax on the ultra-rich.
Taxing executive compensation on salaries over $1 million by making them no longer tax deductible. This is also linked to recent moves by European nations to make economies more equal again.
Giving home buyers tax credits. This is a first step towards fixing Americaâs badly broken housing market…..many European nations are trying to fix that through incentives like this.
Lowering drug prices. One of Bidenâs most revolutionary policy ideas was to let the government negotiate prices for many more drugsâthis is a big deal, because of course Americans are ripped off incredibly badly by their version of âhealthcare.â This would bring the US in line with other Western nations.
More: (brackets by Wrongo)
âif you read between the lines….Biden [is] recognizing how badly broken many aspects of the American social contract [are] âhealthcare, housing, inequality, salaries, taxesâand how all that adds up to an incredibly precarious life even [if you are] at or above the median [income].â
More:
âTaxing billionaires, limiting salaries, intervening in broken markets, giving people actual supportânone of these are ideas we associate in the slightest withâŚAmerican politics. Theyâre the stuff of social democracy, and Bidenâs setting out a sort of lightweight…social democratic vision. Itâs not quite one fully, but what it does…is begin to put America on the path to becoming one, like the rest of the Western world.â
This sets a clear distinction between the Parties in 2024. Democrats since Bill Clinton have not had a clear definition of what they stand for: What do they stand for? Whatâs their overarching idea? Are they after a just society, and a good life for all Americans?
This theory of the good life, the just society, and how theyâre linked now has Biden championing a politics that isnât simply another version of âlifeâs about winners and losersâ. Haque thinks this is an incredibly important evolution in US politics.
Will Bidenâs move leftward bring enough votes to win in November? We have to hope it will. Conservative Republican Peter Wehner in the NYT reminds us that thereâs just 34 weeks to the election:
âThe next 34 weeks are among the more consequential in the life of this nation. Mr. Trump was a clear danger in 2016; heâs much more of a danger now. The former president is more vengeful, more bitter and more unstable than he was, which is saying something…..Heâs already shown heâll overturn an election, support a violent insurrection and even allow his vice president to be hanged. Thereâs nothing he wonât do. Itâs up to the rest of us to keep him from doing it.â
Itâs time on this Monday morning, to wake up America! IF he gets to run the country, Trump will act like a juvenile delinquent, flipping over as many of the cafeteria lunch tables as he can. In a nutshell, thatâs his MAGA platform. And like the Zombie Apocalypse come to life, sooner or later all Republicans who hold public office will endorse him.
The rest of us have to put aside our ideological differences and support Biden. To help you wake up watch and listen to The Clash perform â(White Man) in Hammersmith Palaisâ from their 1979 album âThe Clashâ. This is far from their best, but itâs on point for todayâs column:
This song is from a time when the youth began to realize that sticking together was actually a better idea than allowing themselves to be divided. That has to come back.
Sample Lyric:
White youth, black youth
Better find another solution
Why not phone up Robin Hood
And ask him for some wealth distribution
There were many quality cartoons about how Biden exceeded expectations during his State of the Union speech. Despite all of her notoriety, there were surprisingly few about Sen. Katie Brittâs rebuttal performance. On to cartoons.
Our true choice:
Different messages:
Biden drinks a new concoction:
Katieâs being seen, but not quite as the GOP expected:
Womenâs History Month had a big kick off by the elephant:
Saguaros and poppies, Catalina SP, Tucson, AZ – March 2024 photo by Paul J Van Helden
Youâve all heard and read about Bidenâs State of the Union (SOTA) speech last Thursday. But maybe youâre unaware of the White House strategy for the speech. This was the first SOTA in history to be streamed live on Instagram, in addition to a primary stream on YouTube. Playbook reported that the 9 pm and10 pm hours were the best periods of grassroots fundraising for Biden since the Presidentâs campaign launch.
The White House Office of Digital Strategy also held several events to brief and engage digital creators and media brands around the SOTA. There was a creator watch party in the White House State Dining Room during the speech. Given the declining reach of legacy media, these creator engagement strategies are important.
Trump had planned to comment on Bidenâs speech in real time on his Truth Social platform but it went down for the first part of the SOTA. It took over an hour to read what he had to say. When the site came back, we learned that Trump had pretty much just been ranting about Bidenâs coughing and warning people not to shake his hand because it had germs.
As an aside, Trump has been a germophobe forever. A casual friend knew him quite well in the 1980âs. Then Trump was a young real estate entrepreneur wanting to get into a fancy Westchester, NY country club. My friendâs husband was also in the real estate business, and Trumpâs father Fred prevailed on him to get the Donald into their club. That led to multiple weekends where Trump would take a limo to Westchester to play golf with my friendâs husband and several buddies, all of whom were club members.
It turned out that Trump was a good golfer, so the men were ok with playing with him, except for the obvious cheating on the course. But after each round, the group would adjourn to one of the membersâ homes for a potluck, and there Trumpâs germophobe flag would fly. He wouldnât shake hands, and he washed his hands often. He clearly preferred going through the buffet line first, to the extent that if he couldn’t he wouldnât eat.
Apparently, Trump has done a lot to overcome his germ fears but it all came back when Biden didn’t wash his hands before leaving the podium.
A little on Bidenâs strategy: Biden isnât banking on turning out 100% of Democratic voters. Heâs not necessarily counting on low-propensity voters who normally have very little interest in politics. His goal is for Trump to continue to be himself, while Biden, in addition to getting high Democratic turnout, will peel off about 10% of self-identified Republican voters (up from 8% in 2020) and then win Independents. Wrongo has stated previously that heâs certain that Trump will not get near the same number of votes he got in 2020.
Next up, the Biden campaign is rolling out a $30 million ad buy and many more campaign travel stops.
What to say about the rebuttal speech? Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) spoke from her kitchen table. By the end of the evening, there seemed to be less talk about her vice presidential chances than about who might play her on Saturday Night Liveâs cold open.
Letâs turn our attention to gasoline consumption in the US. Wolf Richter reports that for 2023, gasoline consumption was where it had been 20 years ago, even though miles driven set a new record. This was largely due to more efficient internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and the shift to electric vehicles (EVs). Wolf provided two handy charts:
Gasoline consumption in the US in terms of product supplied to gas stations rose by 1.5% in 2023, to 376 million gallons per day. But that was still down by 3.9% from 2019. Itâs finally back where it was in 2003, (20 years ago).
The second chart above, âper-capita gasoline consumptionâ makes whatâs going on clearer. The US population has grown over the past 20 years, but while gasoline consumption has been flat, per-capita gasoline consumption has plunged by 15% from 2003 and by 21% from 1978.
Further, average fuel economy has increased by 42% over the past 20 years, along with average horsepower, because of technical innovations that make todayâs ICE vehicles more powerful and more economical than ever before. From Wolf:
“Since 1975, fuel economy for highway driving doubled from 14.6 mpg to nearly 30 mpg in 2023!”
Where will gas consumption go from here? Biden says we should be at zero emissions by 2050. How will we replace the tax receipts from federal and state gas taxes?
Enough. Letâs punt on the election and on the debate over EV cars. Itâs time for our Saturday Soother, when we take a break from the assault on our consciousness by media and social media, and instead, focus on calming ourselves before launching into another week of disinformation.
Here at the Mansion of Wrong, weâre planning for projects on the Fields of Wrong, preparing for a meeting with our yard guys. Weâve finally convinced them that because of global warming, yard work must begin in early March rather than in early April.
To help you get centered on this Oscars weekend, grab a seat by a big window, then watch and listen to famed conductor Michael Tilson Thomas lead the USAâs National Youth Orchestra in a 2018 performance of Aaron Coplandâs âHoe-Downâ from his ballet âRodeoâ in Beijing:
âDemocrats want to do something for you. Republicans want to do something to you.â â Tom Sullivan
Super Tuesday is in the rearview, and Nikki Haley announced her exit Wednesday. Haley was a useful person for the Democrats for as long as she was campaigning against Trump. Think about the picadors in bull fighting: Their primary role is to weaken the bull by piercing its neck muscles and tissues, making it easier for the matador to ultimately kill the bull.
That was Nikki, weakening Trump for the past few months. Wrongo reported that Haley overperformed in the GOP primaries:
âWeâre seeing Trump consistently underperform the polls by 7-8 points. Worse for Trump, Fox Newsâ John Roberts talked about an alarming exit poll finding that 59% of Haley voters in South Carolina last night (equal to 40% of the electorate) would not vote for Trump in the general election.â
Depending on the state, between 25%-40% of Republican and conservative independents voted for her.
But now sheâs left the ring, ceding the Republican nomination to Trump. You know, the guy who drove the American economy into a ditch, mismanaged a pandemic resulting in hundreds of thousands of excess American deaths, was found guilty of both sexual assault and fraud in two American courts, and is currently facing charges for mishandling national secrets and fomenting a coup.
Haley earned the votes of millions of Republican voters in her brief time in the spotlight. But sheâs made a business decision to try and remain relevant to the MAGA world in case Trump cannot go forward with his campaign. JVL reports Haley said this:
âIt is now up to Donald Trump to earn the votes of those in our party who did not support him, and I hope he does. This is now his time for choosing.â
Sounds good, right? But JVL calls Haley out about the above:
âIf thereâs been a more cowardly statement over the last year, I canât think of it. Haley refuses to acknowledge that she was supported by a broad coalition of votersâRepublicans, independents, and Democrats. She claims that she is rooting for Trump to win over only the Republican voters who supported her. And instead of leading and standing for the Constitution, she fobs off all questions of agency to Trump. Itâs not time for Nikki Haley to choose.
She believes that sheâs preserving her political viability by seeming to put Trump in a box, making winning her supporters Trumpâs job to succeed or fail to do. It wonât be long before Haley endorses Trump, becoming just another useful tool for MAGA world.
Biden on the other hand immediately invited Haley supporters to join his campaign. From The Hill:
âIt takes a lot of courage to run for President â thatâs especially true in todayâs Republican Party, where so few dare to speak the truth about Donald Trump….Nikki Haley was willing to speak the truth about Trump: about the chaos that always follows him, about his inability to see right from wrong, about his cowering before Vladimir Putin.â
âDonald Trump made it clear he doesnât want Nikki Haleyâs supporters. I want to be clear: There is a place for them in my campaign…â
Then thereâs the hot steaming pile of Mitch McConnell. From the WaPo:
âIt is abundantly clear that former President Trump has earned the requisite support of Republican voters to be our nominee for President of the United States…It should come as no surprise that as nominee, he will have my support.â
From Norm Orenstein:
â…McConnell, once again, demonstrates a level of moral cowardice that is destructive and pathetic. He was responsible for letting Trump off the hook and having him as the Republican nominee when he deep sixed impeachment trial. Now he endorses the vicious autocrat. Shame.â
Why do these Republican hacks support a guy who has attacked their wives? Mitch does it, Cruz did it. Trump attacked Haleyâs husband. Sheâll most likely endorse him as well.
Finally, thereâs Elon Musk who jetted to Mar-a-Lago to meet with Trump. From Judd Legum:
âOn Tuesday…Musk told his 175 million followers on X that President Biden had committed “treason” by “secretly” flying “320,000 illegal immigrants” from Latin America to US airports:
Nearly everything said above by Musk is a lie. Then Trump said that Biden âflew in 325,000 immigrantsâ into the country.
Musk was retweeting Collin Rugg who references a report by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) about a program expanding humanitarian parole for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans. CIS is a notorious anti-immigrant think tank.
Nothing about the expanded humanitarian parole program is “secret.” Biden announced it in a White House speech on January 5, 2023.
ââŚToday Iâm announcing that my administration is going to expand the parole program for people not only from Venezuela but from Cuba, Nicaragua, and Haiti.â
The program was then detailed in a White House press release. The release specifies that the program allows:
“…up to 30,000 individuals per month from these four countries.” To qualify, individuals must have an “eligible sponsor and pass vetting and background checks.”
Musk was amazed that the Biden administration was able to keep the program secret when it involved chartering thousands of planes, flying to dozens of airports. Wrong again. The reason why no one noticed all the planes chartered by the Biden administration is that they didnât charter planes. The parole program requires the individuals to purchase their own flights to the US.
Musk says that this program constitutes “treasonâ. But it is fully within Biden’s legal authority. Every president has used parole authority since it was established in 1952, except Trump. Somebody in Washington ought to look into what the consequences should be when a major defense contractor like Musk says the Commander-In Chief is committing treason.
West Quoddy Head Light, Lubec, ME – February 2024 drone photo by Rick Berk Photography
Wrongo has lots of time for Evan Osnos, a writer for the New Yorker. Osnos wrote a great book âWildland: The Making of America’s Furyâ, a detailed look at Americaâs reactions to 9/11 and to the Jan. 6 storming of the US Capitol. He follows the lives of a few people that reveal how we lost the ability to see ourselves as part of a cohesive society. Highly recommended.
Apparently, Osnos is one member of the media that Biden is willing to spend time with. In a New Yorker article, Osnos offers a look into Bidenâs state of mind as the 2024 election silly season begins. Osnos writes:
âIf you spend time with Biden these days, the biggest surprise is that he betrays no doubts. The world is riven by the question of whether he is up to a second term, but he projects a defiant belief in himself and his ability to persuade Americans to join him….â
More:
âNow, having reached the apex of power, he gives off a conviction that borders on serenityâa bit too much serenity for Democrats who wonder if he can still beat the man with whom his legacy will be forever entwined. Given the doubts, I asked, wasnât it a risk to say, âIâm the one to do itâ? He shook his head and said, âNo. Iâm the only one who has ever beat him. And Iâll beat him again….â
Osnos thinks that for Biden, going against Trump is personal. After all, Trump tried to steal the presidency from him. Biden knows that Republicans have sold imaginary voter fraud to its voters to undermine the democratic process. Bidenâs certain that heâs the best person to hold them at bay.
Biden knows that what Trump and the GOP are planning this fall is exactly what they did on Jan. 6, but with better planning.
The balance of the Osnos report is about Bidenâs view of the upcoming election, about his view of Trumpâs weaknesses, and about the negative polling on Bidenâs policy stances and economic measures. Osnos asked Biden if it was possible for him to convert Trump supporters and others, given that heâs behind in the polls:
âWell, first of all, remember, in 2020, you guys told me how I wasnât going to win? And then you told me in 2022 how it was going to be this red wave?….And I told you there wasnât going to be any red wave. And in 2023 you told me weâre going to get our ass kicked again? And we won every contested race out there….In 2024, I think youâre going to see the same thing.â
Biden wants to make certain that weâre not going to buy into the 2022 red wave again. The NYT helped to push that narrative back then too just as it is today. Osnos, who wrote a book about Bidenâs 2020 win, reflected on the changes brought about by age:
âFor better and worse, he is a more solemn figure now. His voice is thin and clotted, and his gestures have slowed, but, in our conversation, his mind seemed unchanged. He never bungled a name or a date.â
Please. Will the American media just give Bidenâs age a rest? John Harwood tweeted that the Osnos interview, like Harwoodâs own last fall, âshows talk of his alleged mental decline as utter bullshit.â
No one should be a Pollyanna about Bidenâs reelection chances â 2024âs gonna be a fight. Osnos reminds us:
âBiden should be cruising to reelection. Violent crime has dropped to nearly a fifty-year low, unemployment is below four per cent, and in January the S&P 500 and the Dow hit record highs. More Americans than ever have health insurance, and the country is producing more energy than at any previous moment in its history.â
But today, the two Parties have wildly different intentions for the country and have very similar levels of support. In 2020, seven states hinged on a difference of less than three percentage points. Everything will come down to improving turnout on the margins.
Osnos also talked to a Biden campaign staffer, Mike Donilon, about a âfreedom agendaâ:
âItâs easy to miss how unusual a âfreedom agendaâ is for a Democratic Presidential campaign. Since the nineteen-sixties, Republicans have held fast to the language of freedomâfrom the backlash against civil rights to the Tea Party to the Freedom Caucus. But….he sees an opportunity for Democrats to…lay claim to the freedom to âchoose your own health-care decisions, the freedom to vote, the freedom for your kids to be free of gun violence in school, the freedom for seniors to live in dignity.â
He also interviewed Bruce Reed, a close Biden aide who talks about how to bridge the ideological divide:
âWe live in abnormal political times, but the American people are still normal people. Given a choice between normal and crazy, theyâre going to choose normal.â
This is a distilled message that Biden can use in the election: Trump and his anti-Constitution, anti-rule-of-law, anti-democracy cult will sure as hell try to steal your vote this fall to install Trump. Remind voters that itâs not just an abstract: Democracy is certainly on the line this fall, and if Trump returns to power, he intends to gut your freedoms.
We could all help Biden by asking our friends what are they prepared to do?
Bee in a Fishhook Cactus bloom, Anza Borrego SP, CA – February 2024 photo by Paulette Donnellon
âI worry that no matter how cynical I get, itâs never enough…â â Lily Tomlin
There are abundant reasons for cynicism today. First, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) Â will step down as Senate minority leader, three years ahead of his retirement from the Senate. McConnell said the recent death of his wifeâs sister reminded him of his mortality, which encouraged him to step down and take a seat in the back. But for an 82 year-old man who is in iffy health, McConnell may not want to keep sweeping up after the growing number of rogue elephants in the Senate any more.
Wrongo is glad heâs finally going because heâs an awful human being. However, after the Republicans in the Senate replace him, Wrongo is certain to miss the good old days when McConnell was in charge, because whoever follows him will be much worse.
A short look back on Mitchâs tenure: He made it his mission to ensure that nothing would get done under Obama, even if it meant the country went into a default. McConnell denied Obama the chance to fill a Supreme Court seat, holding it open for Trump. If it wasnât for Mitch’s partisan warfare, Trump wouldnât have appointed three right wingers to the current Supreme Court; Roe v. Wade would still be the law of the land.
McConnell fundamentally changed the way the Senate works. Now we all know that if something passes the Senate it needs 60 votes. Mitch McConnell made votes for Cloture (the procedure by which debate is ended and an immediate vote is taken on the matter under discussion) a huge thing. Under McConnellâs leadership, cloture votes went from a handful each term to hundreds.
McConnell will be remembered for his cowardly votes in two Trump impeachment trials. His failure to lead the Senate to a Trump conviction for the Jan. 6 insurrection may well have doomed our democracy. We remember him for his brazen/unprofessional treatment of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) (“…nevertheless, she persisted…”). If it hadn’t been for John McCain, Mitch would have dismantled the ACA, leaving millions of Americans without health insurance today.
His legacy will be his success in his decades-long work of damaging America:
Todayâs second reason for cynicism is the Supreme Courtâs decision to take up the question of whether Trump enjoys total Presidential immunity for his actions in the January 6th case. Their decision sent a shockwave through the nation, dismaying Democrats and any American who understands the implications of the delay. Thanks to a corrupt Supreme Court, the most important of Trumpâs four (four!) criminal trials may not be finished before Americans cast their ballots in November.
âThe Court handed…Trump two gifts last night: time and comfort….The gift of time was so deliberate that it can only serve as one more blow to the Supreme Courtâs battered reputation. The Court…should move with dispatch in vital cases….If the immunity case isnât of the most critical urgency and consequence, what is? Take it as given that the Supreme Court of 2024 is the most intensely political of our lifetimes….â
The Courtâs surprise grant of review was a gut punch for many Democrats. They set the oral argument for April 22, 2024. It is doubtful that an opinion will be issued before June 2024. So, there is little chance that Trump will be on trial in the federal election interference or defense secrets cases before the November election.
There is no doubt that the Court was aware that theyâve delayed the Jan. 6 trial at least four months, past the point at which Trump will be the Republican Partyâs nominee. That time frame is traditionally when the Department of Justice (DOJ) refuses to pursue cases against presidential candidates. Will Attorney General Garland have the cojones to let the case proceed, or will he tell Special Counsel Smith to pause it?
In some ways, this changes nothing. Wrongo has said that the courts were never going to derail Trumpâs candidacy before November. We, the American people, remain in charge of our destiny, and thereby, Trump’s eventual accountability. Our remedy lies in defeating Trump in November. If that happens, Trump will be convicted. There is no cavalry coming. There is no miracle solution.
If we fail to do so, when Trump is again president, he will use the DOJ to end his federal criminal prosecutions.
It was clear that no conviction of Trump (including appeals) for Jan. 6 or the secret documents cases could possibly be final before the November election. A final verdict wouldnât be achieved before the election, so obsessing over when any Trump trial begins is pointless.
Those who hoped the legal system would stop Trump are disappointed. As is anyone who hoped McConnellâs Senate would stop Trump in February 2021. As are those who hoped Garlandâs DOJ would move (quickly) to hold him accountable in 2021 and 2022.
Once again the US Supreme Court has put its thumb on the scales of justice to preserve Republican political dominance. We all recall Bush vs. Gore where an earlier version of a Right-wing Supreme Court gave the 2000 presidential election to GW Bush. Back then, everyone said it was a âone-offâ intervention in the democratic process. But here we are, 24 years later with another one-off.
To pull together these two stories, Mitch McConnell didn’t steal the Supreme Court for nothing,
Wrongo thinks that the many elite lawyer pundits are starting to realize that maybe, just maybe, a majority of the justices on the Supreme Court are robe-wearing political hacks doing whatever they can to perpetuate Republican Party policy.
There remains only one guardrail left to check the Conservative goal of restoring rich, white-Christian hegemony: Voters.
âThe House Republicans have effectively turned the Ukraine war into a free-for-all. Without US arms assistance, thereâs a substantial risk that this war could easily escalate, with the US having only a limited voice in both strategy and tactics.â
The next day, as if on schedule, France chimed in. From Politico:
âFrench President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday that sending Western troops to Ukraine should not be ruled out….There is no consensus today to send ground troops officially but … nothing is ruled out… We will do whatever it takes to ensure that Russia cannot win this war.”
This kabuki took place during a crisis meeting in support of Ukraine that was attended by heads of European states, including German Chancellor Scholz, and top government officials like UK Foreign Secretary Cameron. Ukraineâs president Zelensky attended the meeting by video link.
The subject was first raised publicly by Slovak Prime Minister Fico, who said a ârestricted documentâ circulated prior to the summit had implied that a number of NATO and EU member states were considering sending troops to Ukraine on a bilateral basis.
The too-clever part is âon a bilateral basisâ. Thatâs a mealy-mouth way of saying that NATO wouldnât be supplying the troops, just the individual NATO members.
Macronâs suggestion has started a free-for-all among the NATO members about possibly sending troops to Ukraine. As Wrongo said, the inability of House Republicans to mount a legislative program is clearly affecting both Ukraine and NATO.
Macronâs comments prompted a hawkish response from Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov:
âIn this case, we need to talk not about the likelihood, but about the inevitability of a conflict….These countries must also assess and be aware of this, asking themselves whether this is in their interests, as well as the interests of the citizens of their countries.â
Russia implies that any Western troop deployment in Ukraine would trigger a direct conflict between Moscow and the NATO military alliance.
That naturally sent European leaders scrambling to backtrack: A NATO official told CNN the alliance had âno plansâ to deploy combat troops in Ukraine. And German Chancellor Scholzâimmediately said that European leaders unanimously rejected sending troops to fight in Ukraine against Russia. He was backed up by NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg (the same fellow who gave “permission” to Ukraine to bomb inside Russia using NATOâs soon-to-be delivered F-16s).
The US has always told NATO that it would be foolish to send NATO troops to Ukraine. But what leverage does the US have if it isnât supplying its share of weapons and ammo right now when theyâre most needed? The inaction by House Republicans was the precipitating reason for the hastily called European summit in the first place.
âOne of the outcomes of the EU meeting was support for sourcing more ammunition from outside of NATO. President Zelensky offered a sharp reminder that the EU had massively undershot promises on ammunition deliveries. He underlined the EU’s failure to deliver 1 million shells by March:
“Of the million shells promised to us by the European Union, not 50% arrived, but 30%….
This includes practically everything, ranging from air defense missiles to howitzer shells.
As a possible solution, Czech Prime Minister Fiala said he received “big support” at the talks from European partners for his proposal to source shells from outside the EU for Kyiv. The Czech Republic is leading a campaign to raise âŹ1.4 billion to pay for ammunition for Ukraine, in compensation both for the stalled US aid package and delays in EU deliveries.
This means that buying exclusively within the EU simply isnât realistic. Region-wide reductions in defense spending following the end of the Cold War led to arms manufacturers reducing their capacity to make such weapons. And rebuilding the industry wonât happen overnight.
Widening out the view, Macron appears to be attempting again to assert himself as the leader of a united Europe, just as Europe braces for the possibility of a) no weapons funding from the Biden administration, or b) Trump winning a second term.
Given Trumpâs antipathy toward NATO and transactional view toward alliances, Macron and others have stressed that the burden must fall to Europe to protect from future Russian aggression.
Macron also said he was abandoning his opposition to buying arms for Ukraine from outside the EU. This potential program is known in the EU as âstrategic autonomyâ, policies aimed at making Europe less reliant on the US.
These unilateral actions by Europe signal two ideas. First, that there is no Plan B for supporting Ukraine beyond sending them more weapons, and advanced weapons that have the capability to strike inside Russia. Striking inside Russia is key to Ukraine having a stronger position in any negotiated end to the War, but NATO fears Russiaâs retaliation if longer range weapons are supplied to Ukraine, so they will come slowly, if at all.
Second, Europe believes as of now that Ukraine is losing. Wrongo heard on the PBS NewsHour that the best likely outcome in 2024 is for a Ukraine holding action followed by another offensive in 2025, even though Ukraineâs 2023 offensive produced very little. In this view sending more weapons to Ukraine only seems to buy time in 2024.
The alternative view is that Russia is outproducing the West in artillery shells and ammunition. And think about the Russia, China, Iran axis that Wrongo mentioned last week: Neither China or Iran will willingly let Russia lose a war, because they know whoâll be next.
Another way to think about this: Trump weakened NATO during his presidency. Biden was able to rebuild Americaâs credibility with NATO, helped enormously by Putinâs invasion of Ukraine. Since then, NATO has expanded, adding two new countries to the membership and by stepping up with weapons and financial support for Ukraine. Now, in the waning months of Bidenâs first term, Republicans have cracked NATO again with their unwillingness to fund the Ukraine War.
Snow at sunrise, Grand Canyon NP, AZ – February 2024 photo by John Fecteau
Welcome to another Monday Wake Up. Wrongo wants to touch on a few different ideas today. First, a non-trivial topic that Wrongo plans to return to this year. When we look at the geo-political landscape today, the US is confronting a growing alliance between three countries, each of which holds ill-will towards us and towards our western allies. Those three are China, Russia and Iran.
Weâre confronting them separately and also in the case of the Ukraine War, jointly. This is an excellent time to harken back to something that Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in 1997. He had formerly (through 1981) been Carterâs National Security Adviser:
âPotentially the most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China, Russia and perhaps Iran, an âanti-hegemonicâ coalition, united not by ideology but by complementary grievances. . . . Averting this contingency . . . will require a display of US geostrategic skill on the western, eastern and southern perimeters of Eurasia simultaneously.â
Todayâs geopolitical landscape reflects exactly what Brzezinski feared more than two decades ago. Is the world heading toward what the late Brzezinski referred to as âthe most dangerous scenarioâ? What should America be doing now to head off what weâre seeing from our three rivals? Or is it already too late?
Which presidential candidate will do the better job of blunting this potential power conflict ?
Second, what did the weekendâs South Carolina Republican primary tell us? Trump won by a wide margin. As of this writing, the tally has Trump at 59.8% and Nikki Haley at 39.5%. The media is treating this as a significant triumph. When you win by 20 points, thatâs true.
The real story, however, is that Trump underperformed expectations and failed to expand his coalition beyond his base. If you doubt that, take a look at the polling group 538âs polling vs. actual results for Trump across the three Republican primaries:
Weâre seeing Trump consistently underperform the polls by 7-8 points. Worse for Trump, Fox Newsâ John Roberts talked about an alarming exit poll finding that 59% of Haley voters in South Carolina last night (equal to 40% of the electorate) would not vote for Trump in the general election.
âItâs my view that something broke inside the GOP when Dobbs happened. That even for many Republicans, it was just too much, the party had gone too far, had become too ugly and dangerous.â
Trump and the GOP are showing signs of deep institutional weakness. They had disappointing elections in 2018, 2020, 2022 and 2023. Theyâre replacing the entire leadership team at the RNC due to their ongoing fundraising struggles. Todayâs RNC is broke:
In addition, the GOPâs state parties have atrophied in some key battleground states. Trump is burning through cash at unprecedented rates to fund his many lawsuits. Even Nikki Haley out raised him last month.
Wrongo thinks that weâre finally seeing âTrump Fatigueâ. Everybody has seen his act and has zero need to ever see it again. The assertion that Trump is strong beyond his die-hard MAGA base seems to at last, be untrue. But what does Wrongo know? When he retired from the F500, he thought he would go into private equity. But he was seduced into online journalism by the promise of very small paychecks and zero job security.
Our third story is for the birds. The Guardian reports that:
âThe Eurasian eagle owl named Flaco, which escaped New York Cityâs Central Park Zoo last year, has died after crashing into a building in Manhattan, officials said late on Friday.â
Hereâs Flaco in happier times:
More:
âFlaco was rescued by the zoo in 2010, when he was less than a year old. He was reputed to be the only owl of his kind in the wild in North America, and there were widespread fears he ultimately wouldnât survive for long outside captivity.â
The Eurasian eagle-owl is one of the larger owl species. Flacoâs wingspan was reported to be about 6 ft. Ornithologist Stephen Ambrose wrote on LinkedIn that there was evidence light glare from city buildingsâ windows could blind owls momentarily and increase their risk of crashing into the structures, especially at night.
This raises the evergreen question of how to keep birds safe in US urban areas. Federal officials estimate that one billion birds in the US die annually after accidentally flying into building windows. Wrongo and Ms. Right had this happen to us years ago when a hawk crashed through our lakefront cottage living roomâs wall of glass. He was dead when he hit the floor. It doesnât only happen in high-rise buildings.
Time to wake up, America! Thereâs glare everywhere, including in the mediaâs silly discussion about how overwhelming Trumpâs electoral chances are vs. Biden. Trump has a very small chance of being elected in 2024. To help you wake up, watch this great video of Englandâs Prince William singing âLivin’ on a Prayerâ with Jon Bon Jovi and Taylor Swift at the Winter Whites Gala charity ball at Kensington Palace. This is fun and worth your time:
The future King of England singing with the current Queen of Americana.
