The Daily Escape:
Looking west at sunset with Merced River in foreground, Yosemite NP, CA – 2019 photo by OlafIowa
âThe general culture is often stupid or evil, and would vote out God in favor of the devil if he fed them back their hate and fear in a way that made them feel righteousâ Â -Charles Frazier, from his book, Varina, Pgs. 328-329
Weâre living in the terrible present, an unprecedented time when Trump can say âMake me!â and we canât, although Democrats have been trying since 2016.
That weâre in the middle of a âput the oxygen mask on your democracy firstâ emergency is shown by all that the Trump administration has done since his impeachment acquittal. Democracy is dying right in front of us, and in broad daylight. And the people trying to kill it are making no bones about it to the rest of us.
In this primary season, people are fighting over which Democratic presidential candidate will be the best at beating Trump, but thatâs the wrong question. Strategically, Democrats win if they hold the House and take back the Senate. With both Houses of Congress, Trump will be neutered, even if he wins. If the Democrat wins, and the Party holds both Houses, passing progressive legislation becomes possible.
So the real decision is which candidate will have the best coattails.
That brings us to doctrinal purity tests. Most Democrats see the purity test as a doctrinaire standard of ideological purity. In 2016, Hillary Clinton objected to Bernie Sandersâs saying in a primary debate that she didnât measure up as a progressive. Clinton argued that according to Sandersâs criteria, even Obama wouldnât measure up, âbecause he took donations from Wall Street.â
Democrats must overcome their obsession about who is the most progressive, or who isnât progressive enough. Otherwise, the Party will go into the November fight disunited.
In a column last week, Wrongo talked about Democratsâ disunity in the presidential elections of 2000 and 2016. But we can go back to an earlier event, the campaign of George McGovern in 1972. Nixon shellacked McGovern by a 23-point margin in the popular vote, carrying 49 states.
McGovern was a progressive who called for tax reform. He proposed payroll tax-funded single-payer healthcare. He was for a form of guaranteed income called a âDemograntâ of $1,000 per year for every adult, regardless of income, as an alternative to Nixonâs complicated means-tested welfare overhaul plan. Yangâs plan is similar to McGovernâs
Many Democrats failed to support McGovern, thinking he was too liberal. After McGovernâs defeat, Democrats began running towards the center, even though âthe centerâ has moved further and further to the right with each presidential election.
Weâll have to play hardball to defeat Trump in November. But to play hardball, one must first have balls, something Democrats havenât shown in a very long time. Itâs not surprising that despite winning the popular vote in 6 of the last 7 presidential elections, Dems have little to show for it politically.
Consider that two of the top 2020 contenders include Bernie and Bloomberg, who arenât Democrats, and have at times, held the Party in clear contempt. Think about where we are: Biden couldn’t beat Obama or Hillary in 2008. Sanders couldn’t beat Hillary in 2016. Hillary couldn’t beat Trump.
Is it logical that either of Biden or Bernie could win in 2020?
Wrongo isnât sold on Bloomberg. Criticisms of other candidates are as least as applicable to Bloomberg:
- Biden and Sanders too old? Bloomberg is just as old
- Biden too gaffe-prone? Bloomberg feasts on his own foot frequently
- Sanders health a concern? Bloomberg also had a heart attack and the same operation to treat it
- Sanders’s commitment to the Democratic Party? Bloomberg has actually bankrolled Republican office holders at the state and federal level
- Biden and Klobuchar too conservative? Bloomberg is more conservative
- Klobuchar an evil boss? Donât read Bloomberg’s management philosophy. Itâs best if you arenât a woman
For Bloomberg, maybe itâs as Cyndi Lauper said: âMoney changes everythingâ.
Still, after the disaster of 2016, there are people who will sit on their hands and let Trump be re-elected, rather than support a Dem they find ideologically impure.
You probably donât remember the 1972 campaign clearly because you were too young, but 2000 wasn’t enough? 2016 wasn’t enough?
Wake up America! The best candidate is the one with the longest coattails.
So who has the longest coattails? Btw I don’t think any of the points set forth against Bloomberg will move the needle, or affect any coattails. Dems have nobody who fires up enough voters. Just like 2000, 2004, 2016. To win they need a populist, not a moralizer or intellectualizer or sincerd explained or earnest boyscout; sadly someone who sounds as dumb as Trump or Bush Jr.