The Wrong family is at its annual temporary winter headquarters in Florida, enjoying this view. Blogging will be intermittent until March 12th, when we will be back in residence at the Mansion of Wrong. 2015 photo by Wrongo.
A few cartoons. When will the GOP start complaining, saying âArmed union thugs are patrolling our schoolsâ:
Trump refines his role:
US Cyber Command chief Adm. Mike Rogers said Trump hasnât granted him the authority to disrupt increased cyber threats. Trump, no longer jumping to the rescue. Heâs just the security monitor:
Paul Pillar of Loeblog alerts us that casino magnate Sheldon Adelson is offering to pay for the move of the US embassy to Jerusalem:
Such an offer constitutes a sort of bonus to show Adelsonâs satisfaction with how his earlier large financial contributions to Trumpâs campaign helped to buy the presidentâs decision to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. This move was a personal goal of Adelson, based on a personal affinity with Israel that exceeds any affinity he has with the United States. Looked at from the standpoint of U.S. interests rather than private interests, the move was a huge mistake. It isolated the United States and dealt a major blow to any remaining hope for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
You remember Sheldon, worth $40 billion, the 19th-richest person in the world. Adelson is chairman and CEO of the Las Vegas Sands, the largest casino company in America. He was the largest donor, in both the 2012 and 2016 presidential campaigns. In 2012, Adelson told Forbes magazine that he was:
…against very wealthy people attempting to or influencing elections. But as long as it’s doable, I’m going to do it.
Adelson wanted the US embassy moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and his financial backing of Trump is thought to be the reason that Trump decided to make the move.
According to the Miscellaneous Receipts Act, any money received by the US Government must be placed into the US Treasury General Fund. The 31 USC 3302 was enacted to keep some sort of centralized control over government money, and that includes donations. Generally, unless there is a special act of Congress, a billionaire may not provide earmarked donations to the US Government.
However it may be that the State Department is exempt from needing Congressional approval for the Adelson âdonationâ. From the Slackexchange:
…the Department of State can accept donations for its use, which are automatically appropriated to the Department.
It would seem that money that helps build a new embassy would be for the State Departmentâs own use, and as long as Adelson doesnât get naming rights (!), it is probably legal, and for Adelson, tax-deductible.
The “Sheldon Adelson Israel Embassy of the United States“. Kinda catchy. Some will say, look, this is money that the nation doesnât have to spend. Just take it, and move on. But, when money buys government policy, you think âthird world countryâ, not the US.
But here we are, in the USA. And Trump is happy to see government policy bought and paid for by private funds.
Why should Sheldon Adelson be allowed to use his money to make foreign policy for the US? Will anybody with a bagful of money be able to bribe the US government to advance their personal interests? Ooh, forgot: Citizens United lets them do just that.
Drain the swamp!
That swamp wonât be drained by Trump. If it is to be drained, we all have to wake up, turn out and vote, starting with the 2018 mid-term elections. To help America wake up, here are Michael Franti & Spearhead doing âWe Don’t Stopâ, live at Reggae On The River, in 2004:
Sample lyric:
They got a war for oil, a war for gold
A war for money and a war for souls
A war on terror, a war on drugs
A war on kindness and a war on hugs
A war on birds and a war on bees
They gotta a war on hippies tryin’a save the trees
A war with jets and a war with missiles
A war with high-seated government officials
Wall street war on high finance
A war on people who just love to dance
A war on music, a war on speech
A war on teachers and the things they teach
A war for the last five hundred years
War’s just messin’ up the atmosphere
Those who read the Wrongologist in email can view the video here.
Well, two things Wrongo never thought would happen: Revived student activism, and the US winning an Olympic gold medal in Curling! Wrongo cares deeply about the former, but not so much about the latter.
The week was dominated by the continued fall-out from the Parkland shooting. The gun debate produced a rich harvest of appropriate cartoons, like showing how the NRA would re-write the Second Amendment:
The gun debate points out some GOP inconsistencies:
McConnell and Ryan try reframing the issue:
LaPierre has a message for Mitch:
NRA says only one Amendment really matters:
Trump says we should arm teachers and pay them bonuses for carrying. Think of the consequences:
Where teachers packing heat will lead:
And how would kids react to guns in the classroom?
The futuristic Tianjin Binhai Library opened in November 2017. It is located just outside Beijing, China – photo by Ossip van Duivenbode
Another roller coaster week comes to an end, but Wrongo canât let go of the Parkland shooting or the gun debate just yet. So here are a few observations from a devastating article in the Atlantic by a radiologist in Florida who saw the CT scans of some of the studentâs wounds:
As I opened the CT scan last week to read the next case, I was baffled. The history simply read âgunshot wound.â I have been a radiologist in one of the busiest trauma centers in the nation for 13 years, and have diagnosed thousands of handgun injuries to the brain, lung, liver, spleen, bowel, and other vital organs. I thought that I knew all that I needed to know about gunshot wounds, but the specific pattern of injury on my computer screen was one that I had seen only once before.
More:
In a typical handgun injury that I diagnose almost daily, a bullet leaves a laceration through an organ like the liver. To a radiologist, it appears as a linear, thin, grey bullet track through the organ. There may be bleeding and some bullet fragments.
I was looking at a CT scan of one of the victims of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, who had been brought to the trauma center during my call shift. The organ looked like an overripe melon smashed by a sledgehammer, with extensive bleeding. How could a gunshot wound have caused this much damage?
Still more:
The reaction in the emergency room was the same. One of the trauma surgeons opened a young victim in the operating room, and found only shreds of the organ that had been hit by a bullet from an AR-15…There was nothing left to repair, and utterly, devastatingly, nothing that could be done to fix the problem. The injury was fatal.
Had enough? Hereâs more:
Routine handgun injuries leave entry and exit wounds and linear tracks through the victim’s body that are roughly the size of the bullet. If the bullet does not directly hit something crucial like the heart or the aorta, and they do not bleed to death before being transported to…a trauma center, chances are, we can save the victim. The bullets fired by an AR-15 are different; they travel at higher velocity and are far more lethal. The damage they cause is a function of the energy they impart as they pass through the body. A typical AR-15 bullet leaves the barrel traveling almost three times faster than, and imparting more than three times the energy of, a typical 9mm bullet from a handgun.
And finally:
One of my ER colleagues was waiting nervously for his own children outside the school. While the shooting was still in progress, the first responders were gathering up victims whenever they could and carrying them outside the building. Even as a physician trained in trauma situations, though, there was nothing he could do at the scene to help to save the victims who had been shot with an AR-15. Most of them died on the spot, with no fighting chance at life.
This is why these weapons must be banned. Even if America sells no more of them, it will take a generation or more, for them to disappear from general use. The sooner we start banning them, the safer the country will be. Make America Safe Again!
Now, settle back in your most comfy chair with a vente cup of Red Beard CoffeeâsBuckshot Blend ($17.95/lb.). The roaster says it tastes of rich caramel and apples. Then, contemplate what you can do personally to help high school kids all across America in their effort to ban AR-15âs.
While you are sitting quietly, listen to the Irish group, The Corrs, covering REMâs hit “Everybody Hurtsâ. Â This is from âThe Corrs Unpluggedâ, one of the MTV Unplugged series, recorded live in October, 1999. A song appropriate to the last two weeks:
Sample Lyric:
When your day is long And the night, The night is yours alone When you’re sure you’ve had enough Of this life Well hang on Don’t let yourself go ‘Cause everybody cries And everybody hurts sometimes
Those who read the Wrongologist in email can view the video here.
âThere is no justice. The rich win; the poor are powerless. We become tired of hearing people lie. And after a time, we become dead, a little dead. We think of ourselves as victims â and we become victims. We become weak; we doubt ourselves; we doubt our beliefs; we doubt our institutions; and we doubt the law⊠If we are to have faith in justice, we need only to believe in ourselves and act with justice.â â The closing argument by Paul Newmanâs character in âThe Verdictâ (1982)
Imagine that: Act with justice. Belief in justice is part of believing in democracy. If you lose faith in one, you will lose faith in the other. Those who have refused to give up, like Dr. King, and those who marched for civil rights and then, who marched to end the Vietnam War acted with justice.
Fast forward to today, those Florida high schoolers, who are schooling politicians, are following in those footsteps, attempting to act with justice. They are trying to live up to the founding ethos of the US.
Can the pursuit of justice that gave us successes in civil rights also fuel success in the long, impossibly hard struggle to Make America Safe Again?
Making it Safe from too many guns in the hands of too many Americans?
Before Parkland, Wrongo was about to write off the possibility that gun control activism would achieve much of anything. That we were doomed to remain the worldâs most âexceptionalâ country when it comes to guns.
America thinks that itâs worth it to have a more dangerous society in order to have strong Second Amendment rights. The Second Amendment Absolutists, including the NRA, Trump and the GOP, think the lives weâd save if we had stricter gun controls arenât worth the freedom that owning guns buys them.
And the rest of us donât oppose their viewpoint strongly enough to affect change.
Then along came these high school activists. They have become our last, best hope of blunting the Second Amendment Absolutists. Where did these Florida shooting survivors find their activism and organizing? Can they carry through to a place that their elders havenât been able to reach?
What is refreshing about the students from Stoneman Douglas is that we are hearing about their lived experience.
This has a gravitas far beyond what is handed down from the Beltway. The gun discussions have been mostly led by politicians and lobbyists. But that is being eclipsed by voices with first-hand experience surviving a mass killing. It’s their intimate experience, plus the passion they are bringing that encourages the rest of us to dig in, and help bring about change.
They seem to know that their ground swell of political activism strikes fear into the hearts of politicians. They seem to know that they can make gun control a major issue in the 2018 mid-terms.
They are proving more resilient and savvy than many of us would have given them credit for on the day of the shooting. It isnât their responsibility to fix the world, but since they have a place in it, and a voice, perhaps they can spur some real change.
They are forcing politicians like Sen. Rubio (R-FL) back on their heels. They are forcing the NRA into PR mistakes. Remember this?
Come mothers and fathers throughout the land
And don’t criticize what you can’t understand
Your sons and your daughters are beyond your command
Your old road is rapidly aging
Please get out of the new one if you can’t lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin‘ â B. Dylan
At the CNN Town Hall on Wednesday night, it was obvious that the NRAâs Dana Loesch and Rubio both knew that these students were far beyond their command. But that doesnât mean we should sit back, and expect them to do it alone.
We have to stand up, help them, and certainly vote in huge numbers.
Trump linked two events last week, the shooting in Parkland, FL, and the Mueller indictments of 13 Russians for meddling in our election process, failing at both.
First, the Muller investigation. Trump suggested Saturday that the FBI failed to stop the Florida school shooting because it’s spending too much time on the Russia investigation:
We can agree that the FBI was derelict in investigating the tip about Nikolas Cruz. However, we canât say that the Parkland shooting, or any other for that matter, could have been stopped. The Feds canât foresee the future. This was another Trump ploy to discredit the FBI and the Mueller investigation as its work begins to bite deeply into the issues it was formed to investigate.
Trump tweeted on Sunday that the investigations into Russian meddling are creating chaos and divisions in the US. He said: “They are laughing their asses off in Moscow. Get smart America!â
Itâs worth thinking about what a patriotic president would have done in Trumpâs situation. He would be leading the investigation himself. He would be scouring his own campaignâdoing everything in his power to reassure the country that whatever the Russians may or may not have done, his government owed Putin nothing… Above all, he would be leading the demand for changes to election laws and practices, including holding Facebook to account for its negligence.
Why are Trumpâs reactions so off the mark? Why is The Donald so defensive about something that is of ultimate importance, the integrity of our election process? Shouldnât that be of great interest to anyone who has sworn to defend the Constitution?
Second, students from the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School rallied in southern Florida to protest how the lack of gun regulations affects their lives. One student, Emma Gonzales, told the crowd:
In February of 2017, one year ago, President Trump repealed an Obama-era regulation that would have made it easier to block the sale of firearms to people with certain mental illnesses…Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa was the sole sponsor on this bill that stops the FBI from performing background checks on people adjudicated to be mentally ill and now he’s stating for the record, ‘Well, it’s a shame the FBI isn’t doing background checks on these mentally ill people.‘ Well, duh. You took that opportunity away last year.
Hereâs what Grassley actually said after the Florida shootings:
We have not done a very good job of making sure that people that have mental reasons for not being able to handle a gun getting their name into the FBI files and we need to concentrate on that.
Grassley twists himself into a pretzel, trying to blame the FBI for what Grassley himself did. Who has these ethics?
Another Parkland student, Cameron Kasky, told CNN that many Republicans are only concerned with things like weddings cakes at same-sex weddings:
There is a segment of this society that will shrug this off and send their thoughts and prayers but march for hours over a rainbow wedding cake…
High school kids in Florida are standing up to the President and the Congress. Teenagers are unerring in calling out hypocrisy. Their tolerance for it is lower than that of adults, too. This may be the stone that starts the landslide against the Second Amendment absolutists in Washington. Letâs hope so.
Time to help those Florida teens wake up Trump and Congress. Wake them up to the need to ban assault weapons. To have background checks for all gun buyers, to have liability insurance for every gun owned. To help them wake up, here is Pearl Jam with âJeremyâ from their 1991 debut album âTenâ. The song was inspired by a newspaper article Eddie Vedder read about a high school student who shot himself in front of his English class:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS91knuzoOA
Sample Lyric:
Dead lay in pools of maroon below
Daddy didn’t give attention
To the fact that mommy didn’t care
King Jeremy the wicked
Ruled his world
Jeremy spoke in class today
Jeremy spoke in class today
Clearly I remember
Pickin’ on the boy
Seemed a harmless little fuck
But we unleashed a lion
Those who read the Wrongologist in email can view the video here.
Friday brought Robert Mueller’s indictment of 13 Russians for âinformation warfare against the United States of America“. The best part was that the special counselâs work was totally under the radar, and there were zero leaks.
And thus far, nobody on the right is claiming Muellerâs indictments are âfake newsâ.
One interesting takeaway was that Russian cells were formed to establish phony Facebook, Twitter and other accounts that pushed divisive politics in the US. We already knew this, but we didnât know specifics: At one point, a supposed Islamophobic group protested outside a Texas mosque, and it was met by a pro-Muslim counter-demonstration. Both demonstrations were called for by fake Russian sites. These sites eventually had hundreds of thousands of followers. They spread false memes, including that Clinton supported Sharia law.
Russian sites that were disguised as a part of the Black Lives Matter movement argued that African-Americans should not vote. While it is impossible to show cause and effect, Clinton underperformed with Black voters.
The jury is still out on the extent of Russian influence, and we may never know if it mattered. Still, it is way past time for the Democratic Party to own up to its own failures, rather than continually blaming the Russians, Bernie Sanders, the Green Party, or the deplorables.
After Mueller indictments, Trump and friends now have some âsplaining to do:
Mitch, Paul and the rest of the GOP think they have zero responsibility for gun violence:
The issue is always the guns:
American Exceptionalism was on display again last week:
Pledge of Allegiance needs new words:
Blockbuster Black Panther movie may help beyond entertaining us:
Sigiriya, Sri Lanka – photo by jcourtial for dronestagram. Sigiriya is an ancient rock fortress. The site was the palace for King Kasyapa (477 â 495 BC). It is a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
We live in a seemingly endless loop of outrage. Nothing ever changes, because we waste energy on the âwhat-about?â arguments from both sides, each attempting to reframe the issue to their sideâs advantage. These discussions yield nothing, and solutions are never agreed. This adds to a generalized feeling of powerlessness: The view that everything that is important is out of our hands, and insoluble.
So it is with school shootings, with protecting the DACA kids. And with whatever Russiagate is.
At least the Mueller investigation will run its course. We have to hope that the results will be made public. But if they are released, it will only lead to more debate and disagreement. Until then, weâll continue to gleefully argue our respective Russiagate viewpoints in a fact-free vacuum.
We have experienced hysterical political times before, but they tended to be single issue events. Has there ever been a time when so many people in both political parties have been so single-mindedly determined to whip up anger?
When weâre looking at just a single issue, one side or the other often simply runs out of steam. Then the issue can be resolved both in Washington and in the mind of the public.
When we experience multiple issues simultaneously, the available energy is expended across the entire spectrum of problems. Thus, there isnât enough energy to direct successfully at a single issue. So nothing is resolved.
This is where we are in February 2018, in a kind of nervous exhaustion: Too many issues and too few resolutions.
Can something, or someone unite us? Will a big event allow a majority to coalesce around a point of view, or a leader?
History shows that when we are in the grip of anxiety, it can be a relief if something we fear actually happens. Think about when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. It was widely reported that the response of the public, including anti-war activists, was relief. There was a feeling that at last a course had been set, a key decision made. FDR united the disparate groups behind a war.
While the same situation doesnât quite apply today, we crave some sort of decisions, perhaps some sort of decisive act. What would that be? It isnât possible to see from where we are today.
As John Edwards said, there are two Americas. The one that sends their children to private schools, and the second one that sends their children to public schools. The second group has the kids who get shot by the gunmen. And politicians get away with platitudes about their thoughts and prayers.
Unfortunately, they then decide that fixing the problem is not worth their time.
We may have reached a breaking point. Shitty jobs, shitty pay, shitty hours, and little hope of advancement. No easy access to medical care, an uneven social safety net. Wrongo lived through the chaotic 1960âs. He endured Reaganâs show-no-mercy 1980âs. Those were bad times.
But, in a lot of ways, 2018 is worse. Today, there is an immense lack of mutual respect. And there is a ubiquitous atmosphere of a powerless people.
Wow, who said all that??
We desperately need a weekend where we can unplug from the media and focus on other things. In other words, we need a Saturday soother. Start by brewing up a big cuppa Stumptown Coffeeâs Holler Mountain Blend, ($16/12oz.) The Stumptown people promise flavors of blackberry, citrus and toffee in a creamy, full body. Your mileage may vary.
Now, get in your favorite chair and listen to some, or all of the musical score from the film âDunkirkâ. Both the score and the film are Oscar-nominated. The filmâs director Christopher Nolan suggested to the musical director Hans Zimmer, that they use Elgarâs âNimrodâ from the 1898-99 âEnigma Variationsâ as part of the theme. They decided that the movieâs music should be about time, and how for the men on the beaches, time was running out. They picked the âEnigma Variationsâ because itâs part of English culture, less a national anthem than an emotional anthem for the nation. Along the way, consistent with using time, they slowed it down to 6 beats per minute. Listen to their version from the movie:
Those who read the Wrongologist in email can view the video here.
“Don’t tell me tomorrow isn’t the appropriate time to debate gun violence. If you’re a political leader doing nothing about this slaughter, you’re an accomplice.” â Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT)
Can we get politicians to deal with gun violence? Politicians like to reframe the problem, like saying that we need more “good people” with guns. But, there were two armed police officers stationed at the Parkland FL school. Upon hearing that, the gun absolutists might argue: “If only the teachers and students had their own weapons, it probably would have worked out just fine…”
And we are getting numb. The LA Times editorial asks: (emphasis by Wrongo)
When does an epidemic stop being an epidemic and become just a basic part of regular life? It’s been 19 years since the nation was horrified by the carnage at Columbine in suburban Denver. It’s been just over five years since the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Quick: What was the most recent mass shooting incident (at least four wounded) at a school before the one on Wednesday? Here’s the sick part: There have been so many school shootings that it takes a bit of work to answer what should be an easy question.
Who remembers clearly the particulars of the last school shooting? Not Wrongo, and probably not you. We have grown weary of being outraged after so many shootings. We’ve become numb to the sensations of outrage and pain for the victims and their families. It’s official. Guns have more rights than humans in our 21st Century America.
We have to control guns if we want to turn the tide. Consider this chart from the Tewkesbury Lab that graphs gun deaths by gun ownership:
There is a clear relationship between gun access and gun violence, and the US clearly has the most gun violence and the most guns. We might ask why some countries are above the trend line, and others are below it. When your country is above the line, your citizens not only own more guns per capita, they also have a harder time keeping their guns pointed away from other people.
Trump and Congress should have a goal of minimizing the risk of gun deaths. The best way to accomplish this is reducing access to guns. If you want to reduce your personal risk from gun related violence, you can move to a state or a country where gun laws are stricter and cultural norms surrounding guns are more progressive.
If you can’t or don’t want to move, you need to work to pass stricter gun laws where you live.
Politicians can argue about details, but the fundamentals are clear. It is like smoking. If you want to reduce smoking, you make it harder and more expensive to smoke. Only the tobacco industry and the politicians they had purchased really argued with that logic.
Why should it be different with guns?
We are unique in our worship of guns. The Second Amendment provides a big blanket of excuse for gun lovers to wrap themselves in, but Second Amendment rights shouldn’t be superior to the right of your kid to return home from school alive.
We need to control the number of guns. We need to make sure guns are being used for the right reason eg. hunting. My friend hunts and he told me about long range scopes reviewed, I can see why people enjoy shooting as a hobby but guns can also be very dangerous. Special care needs to be taken with guns. We also need to figure out how to change our acceptance and glorification of violence. It is young men like the kid who killed 17 in Parkland FL, who avoid mental health advice, because they don’t want to look weak. They are the same ones who are perpetually angry. They pick up a gun, and they let their gun do some punishing. And guns do that quickly and efficiently.
We have to stop them. Republicans are owned by the NRA. So first, we need to regain control of the House and Senate. We also need to have the gun control legislation ready for when that time comes.
We need better ad campaigns ads that spell out about what America loses with every shooting.
And until then, we need to protect our children with increased awareness and safety measures in schools, like every classroom having a bulletproof shield for example. We shouldn’t have to do this, but unfortunately, for now we do.
We can’t stop every wacko from harming people, but we can sharply reduce the percentage of wackos that have guns!
Valley of Desolation, Eastern Cape, South Africa – 2018 photo by Ottho Heldring
The Trump infrastructure plan asks states and cities to partner with private equity to build their roads, bridges and water treatment plants. As the WSJ explains, private equity says they are not interested. Apparently, they donât want to build things; they prefer to purchase existing assets: (emphasis by Wrongo)
Fund managers say they are mainly looking for assets that are already privately ownedâsuch as renewable energy, railroads, utilities and pipelinesâand not the deteriorating government-owned infrastructure like roads and bridges that helped attract the capital in the first place. To the extent they are interested in public assets, the focus is more likely to be on privatizing existing infrastructure than on new developmentâthe heart of Mr. Trumpâs push.
One area where private equity may think they have a role to play is with Americaâs threatened water systems, which are existing assets. When people think of water crises, they think of places like Flint, Michigan, because a failed urban water system affects huge numbers of people. If you’re worried about the quality of your drinking water, take a look at https://waterfilterway.com/.
But most health-based violations of drinking-water standards occur in small towns. Of the 5,000 US drinking-water systems that racked up health-based violations in 2015, more than 50%were systems that served 500 people or fewer.
But when we add up the total number of people affected, rural Americaâs drinking-water situation is an order of magnitude greater than Flintâs. Millions of rural Americans are subject to unhealthy levels of contaminants in their drinking water, largely from agriculture and coal mining.
And as the rural/urban economic gap grows, this basic inequality wonât get fixed unless something radical is done to improve water quality in rural America.
Agriculture is the culprit in many rural towns, and unhealthy levels of nitrates is the primary cause. Nitrogen-based fertilizer runs off of farmlands and into the nationâs fresh water. The health impact of ingesting nitrates is serious:
Two-thirds of communities with nitrate levels at or above 5 ppm are in 10 states where agriculture is big business.
Almost three-fourths of communities whose drinking water is at or above the legal limit are found in just five states â Arizona, California, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas.
Remediation costs vary, but a 2012 report from the Center for Watershed Sciences at UC Davis gives a yardstick. They say that a community of just under 5,000 people could incur annual costs ranging from $195,000 to $1.1 million to build and operate an ion exchange system, while a reverse osmosis system would cost from $1.1 million to $4 million a year. A $4 million system would cost $800 per citizen.
These costs may be far beyond the ability of small towns to finance. What is really going on here is another case of âsocializing lossesâ. Farms are polluting the water, and the town is left to pay for remediation. And the big agriculture lobbies are making sure that their members avoid any liability for poisoning their towns.
We know that we havenât been able to fund Flintâs water remediation with public funds. How will we deal with the rest of Americaâs polluted drinking water? It isnât likely that towns and cities can do much more. Some cities have debt capacity, the capital markets may be willing to lend to them. However, hostility to new taxes on the local level means that issuing new debt is difficult politically for mayors and town councils.
Trumpâs infrastructure plan opens up the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF). This federal financial assistance program for water infrastructure projects would allow private firms to both manage and repair water infrastructure at taxpayerâs expense. Previously, only states and municipalities could access the fund.
Funneling CWSRF funds to private water system providers means our most vulnerable towns will have to turn over basic infrastructure to for-profit companies. And those companies will charge for the privilege. On average, private for-profit water utilities charge households 59% more than local governments charge for drinking water, an extra $185 a year.
When your water is poisoning you, should you agree to raise water rates to fix it, or do you expect to get pure water for the money you are already paying?
What if you are unable to move to a place where the water is safe?
If your water system will cost $ millions for a town of 500, how can it possibly be paid for, except by public funding?
